Written by John Dillon
Vauxy Theatre company
- 19th April 2008)
So we're well into 2008 now, and Liverpool people are officially living
in the European Capital Of Culture. It's supposed to be all glitz and
glamour, but anyone who's walked through the city, and especially beyond
the centre, knows that it's anything but. A play presenting the reality
behind the banners therefore has to do more than present us with what
is already staring us in the face.
Some People followed an evening in the life of three people from Liverpool's
street bound underclass, as they try to keep warm, get fed, and while
away the endless hours. Irish intellectual Danny (Michael Christopher)
eloquently pronounced on poetry and the inequities of life. Frazer (Danny
Williamson) was bigoted and belligerent, but had a perfectly functioning
bullshit detector. Marie (Laura Holden) was a drug addicted prostitute
who brings some meagre comfort (and stolen supplies) to her two friends.
There is a lot to recommend this play. All three actors performed superbly,
and were completely convincing, at least as far as the script would allow.
And there were plenty of darkly humorous laughs to be had, often when
Frazer verbally punctured either Danny's sentimentality or society's hypocrisy
with his biting wit. But for a play that was nearly two and a half hours
long, it had very little of any value to say about people existing on
the very edge of society.
This quickly became apparent after the interval, when the trio took turns
to tell their life stories. In each case, there was a yawning gap between
a traumatic but isolated event in the character's personal history, and
the fact of their homelessness. Frazer's wife had died, Danny had been
sexually assaulted by a priest at the age of nine, and Marie's baby had
been taken off her when she was fourteen. Sure, all these could be links
in the chain, but they couldn't be the chain itself, or even the main
part of it.
Similarly, apart from the accents and the distant celebratory fireworks,
there was nothing to suggest that this was Liverpool in the here and now.
It is a place where there are thousands of newly built flats lying empty,
where people are getting thrown out of their homes to make way for the
wealthy, and where poverty and a lack of social housing has created a
housing list twenty thousand names long. Not to even allude to this is
a glaring omission in a play about homelessness, and one that helps to
trap us in the current unhappy circumstances.
Outside the theatre, a woman explained that she had been homeless, and
that she had found the production cathartic. That's great for her, but
it doesn't put a roof over anyone's head.
Comment left by hannah darwent on 23rd April, 2008 at 16:20
If this play had set out to be a campaigning piece I would agree with your comments about the lack of social housing and the gentrification of our city being overlooked. As it was a drama, that merely gave representations of how life's experiences can form part of a disintegrating existence for some unfortunates, I felt that it served its purpose. A piece of agitprop it was not but I am sure that it made those who viewed it consider how desperate the situation is for so many people. It worked for me.